Menu
Home
Log in / Register
 
Home arrow Economics arrow Knowledge-creating Milieus in Europe
< Prev   CONTENTS   Next >

References

Allesch, J. (1985). Innovation centers and science parks in the Federal Republic of Germany: Current situation and ingredients for success. In J. M. Gibb (Ed.), Science parks and innovation centers: Theirs economic and social impact (pp. 58–68). Amsterdan: Elsevier.

Amirahmadi, H., & Saff, G. (1993). Science parks: A critical assessment. Journal of Planning Literature, 8(2), 107–123.

Bell, G., & Callon, M. (1994). Techno-economic networks and science and technology policy. STI

Review, 14, 67–126.

Bigliardi, B., Dormio, A. I., Nosella, A., & Petroni, G. (2006). Assessing science parks' performances: Directions from selected Italian case studies. Technovation, 26, 489–505.

Bowker, G. C., & Star, S. L. (1999). Sorting things out. Classification and its consequences.

Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Bowker, G. C., Baker, K., Millerand, F., & Ribes, D. (2010). Toward information infrastructure studies: Ways of knowing in a networked environment. In J. Hinsinger, L. Klastrup, &

M. Allen (Eds.), International handbook of internet research (pp. 97–117). London: Springer. Accessed July 2, 2013, from interoperability.ucsd.edu/docs/07BowkerBaker_ InfraStudies.pdf

Bruun, H., & Hukkinen, J. (2003). Crossing boundaries: An integrative framework for studying

technological change. Social Studies of Science, 33, 95–116.

Bryant, A., & Charmaz, K. (Eds.). (2007). The Sage handbook of grounded theory. London: Sage. Callon, M. (1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestification of the scallops and fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In J. Law (Ed.), Power action and belief: A new sociology of

knowledge? (pp. 196–223). New York: Routledge.

Carlile, P. R. (2004). Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organization Science, 15(5), 555–568.

Clarke, A. E., & Star, S. L. (2008). The social world framework: A theory/methods package. In

E. J. Hackett, O. Amsterdamska, M. Lynch, & J. Wajcman (Eds.), The handbook of science and technology studies (pp. 113–137). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Colombo, M., & Delmastro, M. (2002). How effective are technology incubators? Evidence from Italy. Research Policy, 31, 1103–1122.

Dura˜o, D., Sarmento, M., Varela, V., & Maltez, L. (2005). Virtual and real-estate science and technology parks: A case study of Taguspark. Technovation, 25, 237–244.

Edwards, P., Jackson, J. S., Bowker, G., & Williams, R. (2009). Introduction: An agenda for

infrastructure studies. Journal of the Association for Information Systems (JAIS), 10, 364–374. Edwards, P. N., Jackson, S. J., Bowker, G. C., & Knobel, C. P. (2007, January). Understanding Infrastructure: Dynamics, tensions, and design. NSF Report of a Workshop on “History & Theory of Infrastructure: Lessons for New Scientific Cyberinfrastructures”. Accessed July

3, 2013, from deepblue.lib.umich.edu/handle/2027.42/49353

Felsenstein, D. (1994). University-related science parks-“seedbeds” or “enclaves” of innovation?

Technovation, 14(2), 93–110.

Galison, P. (1997). Image and logic. A material culture of microphysics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Gerson, E. M., & Star, S. L. (1986). Analysing due process in the workplace. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems, 4(3), 257–270.

Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategy for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.

Goffman, E. (1956). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday. Hall, P. (1991). Three systems, three separate paths. APA Journal, 16, 16–20.

Hanseth, O., Monteiro, E., & Hatling, M. (1996). Developing information infrastructure: The tension between standardization and flexibility. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 21(4), 407–426.

Karasti, H., Baker, K. S., & Millerand, F. (2010). Infrastructure time: Long-term matters in

collaborative development. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 19, 377–415.

Kihlgren, A. (2003). Promotion of innovation activity in Russia through the creation of science parks: The case of St. Petersburg. Technovation, 23, 65–76.

Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society.

Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

Law, J. (1992). Notes on the theory of the actor-network: Ordering, strategy and heterogeneity.

Systems Practice, 5, 379–393.

L€ofsten, H., & Lindel€of, P. (2002). Science parks and the growth of new technology-based firms— Academic-industry links, innovation and markets. Research Policy, 31, 859–876.

MacDonald, S. (1987). British science parks: Reflections of the politics of high technology. R&D Management, 17, 25–37.

Monteiro, E., Pollock, N., Hanseth, O., & Williams, R. (2013). From artifacts to infrastructures.

Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 22, 575–607.

Orlikowski, W. J. (2007). Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organization Studies, 28, 1435–1448.

Pellegrino, G. (2008). Convergence and saturation. Ecologies of artefacts in mobile and ubiquitous interaction. In K. Ny´ıri (Ed.), Integration and ubiquity. Towards a philosophy of telecommunications convergence (pp. 75–82). Vienna: Passagen Verlag.

Ratinho, T., & Henriques, E. (2010). The role of science parks and business incubators in converging countries: Evidence from Portugal. Technovation, 30, 278–290.

Schmidt, K., & Bannon, L. (1992). Taking CSCW seriously. Supporting articulation work.

Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 1, 7–40.

Star, S. L. (1999). The ethnography of infrastructure. American Behavioural Scientist, 43(3), 377–391.

Star, S. L. (2007). Living grounded theory: Cognitive and emotional forms of pragmatism. In

A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The Sage handbook of grounded theory (pp. 75–93). London: Sage.

Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, “Translation” and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's museum of vertebrate zoology. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387–420.

Star, S. L., & Ruhleder, K. (1996). Steps toward an ecology of infrastructure: Design and access for large information spaces. Information Systems Research, 7, 111–134.

Star, S. L., & Strauss, A. (1999). Layers of silence, arenas of voice: The ecology of visible and invisible work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 8, 9–30.

Star, S. L., Bowker, G. C., & Neumann, L. J. (2003). Transparency beyond the individual level of scale: Convergence between information artifacts and communities of practice. In A. PetersonKemp, N. A. van Van House, B. P. Buttenfield, & B. Schatz (Eds.), Digital library use. Social practice in design and evaluation (pp. 241–269). Cambridge, MA: Massachussets Institute Technology.

Strauss, A. (1978). A social world perspective. Studies in Symbolic Interaction, 1, 119–128.

Strauss, A. (1988). The articulation of project work: An organizational process. The Sociological Quarterly, 29(2), 163–178.

Suchman, L., & Trigg, R. (1993). Artificial intelligence as craft-work. In S. Chaiklin & J. Lave

(Eds.), Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context (pp. 144–172). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Suchman, L. (2000). Organizing alignment: A case of bridge building. Organization, 7(2), 311–327.

Vaidyanathan, G. (2008). Technology parks in a developing country: The case of India. Journal of Technology Transfer, 33, 285–299.

Vianello, M. (2013). Smart Cities. Gestire la complessita` urbana nell'era di Internet. Maggioli Editore: Santarcangelo di Romagna.

Watkins-Mathys, L., & Foster, M. J. (2006). Entrepreneurship: The missing ingredient in Chinás STIPs? Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 18, 249–274.

Wikipedia. (2013a). Business incubator. Accessed August 3, 2013, from en.wikipedia.org/ wiki/Business_incubator

Wikipedia. (2013b). University spin-off. Accessed August 3, 2013, from en.wikipedia.org/ wiki/Business_incubator

Zittrain, J. L. (2006). The generative Internet. Harvard Law Review, 119, 1974–2040.

 
Found a mistake? Please highlight the word and press Shift + Enter  
< Prev   CONTENTS   Next >
 
Subjects
Accounting
Business & Finance
Communication
Computer Science
Economics
Education
Engineering
Environment
Geography
Health
History
Language & Literature
Law
Management
Marketing
Philosophy
Political science
Psychology
Religion
Sociology
Travel