Log in / Register
Medien und Kommunikationswissenschaft
Home arrow Communication arrow Strategic Communication for Sustainable Organizations
< Prev   CONTENTS   Next >

1.5 Concluding Thoughts

The precautionary principle specifies that scientific uncertainty is no excuse for inaction on an environmental problem. Instead of reacting to environmental problems after the fact, this principle suggests we must try to avoid environmental problems initially. Organizational forces aligned against the precautionary principle in the USA seek to create uncertainty. They use the trope of uncertainty to nurture doubt in the public's perceptions of scientific claims and delay calls for action (Cox 2013). Doubt strips people of the motivation to act and weakens our public and political will to solve problems. Awareness of how the created uncertainty is a communication strategy used to delay action helps us better understand why climate change is being debated long after a scientific consensus has emerged. Understanding precedes action. And action must occur even in the face of uncertainty. The Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS), an alliance of more than 400,000 citizens and scientists, argue that scientific analysis—not political calculations or market-based concerns—should guide the formation of our government policy, corporate practices, and consumer choices. They believe thoughtful action based on the best available science can help safeguard our future and the future of our planet. Now we must quickly work within and through organizations to adapt to global warming. I encourage each reader to use communication strategically to move the global debate and action agenda forward. You can help your organization be a leader in its sector. Many of the organizations you will read about in this book are already leading the way.


Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.

BICEP. (2013). Tackling climate change is one of America's greatest economic opportunities of the 21st century. Accessed 25 June 2013.

Blackburn, W. R. (2007). The sustainability handbook: The complete management guide to achieving social, economic and environmental responsibility. London: Earthscan.

Bushwick, S. (2011). Top 10 cities for green living. Scientific American.¼top-10-cities-green-living. Accessed 23 Dec 2013.

Christensen, L. T., Morsing, M., & Thyssen, O. (2015). Discursive closure and discursive openings in sustainability. Management Communication Quarterly, 29, 135–144.

Clair, R. P., & Anderson, L. B. (2013). Portrayals of the poor on the cusp of capitalism: Promotional materials in the case of Heifer International. Management Communication Quarterly, 27, 537–567.

Cox, R. (2013). Environmental communication and the public sphere (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Sage.

Domenec, F. (2012). The “greening” of the annual letters published by Exxon, Chevron and BP

between 2003 and 2009. Journal of Communication Management, 16, 296–311.

Dryzek, J. S. (2005). The politics of the earth: Environmental discourses (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Eisenberg, E. (2007). Strategic ambiguities: Essays on communication, organization, and identity.

Thousand Oaks: Sage.

President Obama's Plan to Fight Climate Change. (2013). climate-action-plan. Accessed 20 Dec 2013.

Frandsen, F., & Johansen, W. (2011). Rhetoric, climate change, and corporate identity management. Management Communication Quarterly, 25, 511–530.

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2013). Climate change 2013: The physical science basis. Accessed 20 Dec 2013.

International Energy Agency. (2011). Accessed 23 Dec 2013.

Lakoff, G. (2010). Why it matters how we frame the environment. Environmental Communication: A Journal of Nature and Culture, 4, 70–81.

Leeds-Hurwitz, W. (2009). Social construction of reality. In S. W. Littlejohn & K. A. Foss (Eds.),

Encyclopedia of communication theory (Vol. 2, pp. 891–894). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.

Leitch, S., & Davenport, S. (2007). Strategic ambiguity as a discourse practice: The role of keywords in the discourse on 'sustainable' biotechnology. Discourse Studies, 9, 43–61.

National League of Cities. (2013). Climate change. Accessed 15 Nov 2013.

Okereke, C., Wittneben, B., & Bowen, F. (2012). Climate change: Challenging business, transforming politics. Business and Society, 51, 7–30.

Peloza, J., Loock, M., Cerruti, J., & Muyot, M. (2012). Sustainability: How stakeholder perceptions differ from corporate reality. California Management Review, 55, 74–97.

Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer-Verlag.

Schendler, A. (2009). Getting green done: Hard truths from the front line of the sustainability

revolution. New York: PublicAffairs.

Seelye, K. Q. (2012). Rising temperatures threaten fundamental change for ski slopes. New York Times. hood.html?pagewanted¼alland_r¼0. Accessed Oct 2013.

United Nations Environmental Programme. (2013). Climate change. climatechange/NewHome/tabid/794594/Default.aspx. Accessed 12 Jan 2014.

Vaughan, D. R. (2009). Elaboration likelihood theory. In S. W. Littlejohn & K. A. Foss (Eds.),

Encyclopedia of communication theory (Vol. 1, pp. 330–322). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.

Wals, A. E. J., & Schwarzin, L. (2012). Fostering organizational sustainability through dialogic interaction. The Learning Organization, 19, 11–27.

Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations: Foundations for organizational science.

Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Wexler, M. N. (2009). Strategic ambiguity in emergent coalitions: The triple bottom line.

Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 14, 62–77.

World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Found a mistake? Please highlight the word and press Shift + Enter  
< Prev   CONTENTS   Next >
Business & Finance
Computer Science
Language & Literature
Political science