Menu
Home
Log in / Register
 
Home arrow Business & Finance arrow Proceedings of the 1st AAGBS International Conference on Business Management 2014
< Prev   CONTENTS   Next >

6.5 Conclusion

Generally, positive responses were given by the MPs about the Internet technologies. This implies that Internet communications have managed to empower the MPs in terms of their perceived trust and continuance use of the ICTs. In other words, the MP community is now aware of the importance of technology as a tool to search for information and how it can add positive values and change their lives to get closer to the public. Although the community develops a perceived trust and continuance of use, some felt frustrated due to the technical glitches and problems associated with accessibility. These issues need to be seriously considered, and appropriate measures must be taken because such problems do affect the MPs' motivation and acceptance toward technology. Furthermore, motivation is a crucial factor for ensuring that the utilization of technology is successful. In other words, prior knowledge of these factors and their interactions can enhance the adoption and continuance of use at the various phases of the usage. Overall, according to the findings, technology tools must be easy to use as well as must be perceived of being useful among the users. More importantly, the results have indicated that technology might be easy to use and it might be perceived very useful, yet the ability and capacity to use it play some important roles. Therefore, it is suggested that members of parliament in Malaysia should be given more trainings to enhance their capabilities and self-efficacy of handling technology devices or technology applications of Internet tools as some of them may not be technology savvy.

References

1. Masters Z, Mactintosh A, Smith E (2004) Young people and e-Democracy: creating a culture of participation. In: Traunmuller R (ed) Electronic Government, EGPV, LNCS 3183, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp 15–22

2. Heeley M, Damodaran L (2010) Digital inclusion: a review of international policy and practice. Loughborough University Press, Loughborough

3. United Nations (2006) World information society report. International Telecommunication

Union, Geneva

4. Lindh M, Miles M (2007) Becoming electronic parliamentarians? ICT usage in the Swedish Riksdag. J Legis Stud 13(3):422–440

5. Dai X, Norton P (2007) The internet and parliamentary democracy in Europe. J Legis Stud

13(3):342–353

6. Barber B (1984) Strong democracy: participatory politics for a new age. University of California Press, Berkeley

7. Held A (1996) Models of democracy. Blackwell Publisher, Cambridge

8. Van Djik J (2000) Models of democracy and concepts of communication. In: Hacker KL, van Djik J (eds) Digital democracy issues of theory and practice. Sage, London

9. Willhelm A (1998) Virtual sounding boards: how deliberative in on-line political discussion.

Inf Commun Soc 1(3):313–338

10. Coleman S (2007) eDemocracy: the history and future of an idea. In: Quah D, Silverstone R, Mansel R, Avgerou C (eds) The Oxford handbook of information and communication technologies. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 362–382

11. Di Gennaro C, Dutton W (2006) The internet and the public: online and offline political participation in the United Kingdom. Parliam Aff 59(2):299–311

12. Ahmad NB (2008) Towards a new mode of governance in Malaysia: policy, regulatory and institutional challenges of digital convergence, PhD thesis (unpublished), University of Hull, United Kingdom

13. Xue S (2005) Internet policy and diffusion in China, Malaysia and Singapore. J Inf Sci 31:238–250

14. Macintosh A, Smith E (2002) Citizen participation in public affairs. In: Traunmuller R, Lenk K (eds) Electronic Government FGOV, LNCS 2456, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp 256–263

15. Norton P (2007) Four models of political representation: British MPs and the Use of ICT.

J Legis Stud 13(3):354–369

16. Fishkin JS (1995) The voice of the people, public opinion and democracy. Yale University Press, New Haven

17. Gibson RK, Lusoli W, Ward S (2005) Online participation in the UK: testing a

“contextualised” model of internet effects. Br J Polit Int Relat 7(4):561–583

18. Rheingold H (1993) The virtual community. Addison and Wesley, Reading

19. Coleman S, Norris DF (2005) A new agenda for eDemocracy, Forum discussion paper no. 4, Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford, UK

20. Zittel T (2003) Electronic democracy and electronic parliaments: a comparison between the US House, the Swedish Riksdagen and the German Bundestag, Studienverlag

21. Leston-Bandeira C (2007) Are ICTs changing parliamentary activity in the Portuguese parlia-

ment? J Legis Stud 13(3):403–419

22. Official portal Malaysia Parliament malaysiaparliament.com. Online: Retrieve on 23 June 2013

23. Ambali AR, Ahmad NB (2013) Halal food and products in Malaysia: people's awareness and

policy implications. Intellect Discourse 21(1):7–32

24. Ambali AR (2009) E-government policy: ground issues in E-filing system. Eur J Soc Sci 11(2):249–266

 
Found a mistake? Please highlight the word and press Shift + Enter  
< Prev   CONTENTS   Next >
 
Subjects
Accounting
Business & Finance
Communication
Computer Science
Economics
Education
Engineering
Environment
Geography
Health
History
Language & Literature
Law
Management
Marketing
Philosophy
Political science
Psychology
Religion
Sociology
Travel