Menu
Home
Log in / Register
 
Home arrow Computer Science arrow Building the Infrastructure for Cloud Security
< Prev   CONTENTS   Next >

Security as a Service

What would be a practical approach to handling security in a composite application environment? Should it be baked-in—namely, every service component handling its own security—or should it be bolted on after integration? As explained above, we call these service components servicelets, designed primarily to function as application building blocks rather than as full-fledged, self-contained applications.

Unfortunately, neither approach constitutes a workable solution. A baked-in approach requires the servicelet to anticipate every possible circumstance for every customer during the product's lifetime. This comprehensive approach may be overkill for most applications. It certainly burdens with overwrought security features the service developer trying to quickly bring a lightweight product to market. The developer may see this effort as a distraction from the main business. Likewise, a bolted-on approach makes it difficult both to retrofit security on the servicelet and to implement consistent security policies across the enterprise.

One possible approach out of this maze is to look at security as a horizontal capability, to be handled as another service. This approach assumes the notion of a virtual enterprise service boundary.

New Enterprise Security Boundaries

The notion of a security perimeter for the enterprise is essential for setting up a first line of defense. The perimeter defines the notion of what is inside and what is outside the enterprise. Although insider attacks can't be ruled out, let's assume for the moment that we're dealing with a first line of defense to protect the “inside” from outsider attacks.

In the halcyon days, the inside coincided with a company's physical assets. A common approach was to lay out a firewall to protect unauthorized access between the trusted inside and untrusted outside networks.

Ideally, a firewall can provide centralized control across distributed assets with uniform and consistent policies. Unfortunately, these halcyon days actually never existed. Here's why:

• A firewall only stands a chance of stopping threats that attempt to cross the boundary.

• Large companies, and even smaller companies after a merger and acquisition, have or end up having a geographically disperse IT infrastructure. This makes it difficult to set up single-network entry points and it stretches the notion of what “inside” means.

• The possibility of composite application with externalized solution components literally turns the concept of “inside” inside out. In an increasingly cloud-oriented world, composite applications are becoming the rule more than the exception.

• Mobile applications have become an integral part of corporate IT. In the mobile world, certain corporate applications get exposed to third-party consumers, so it's not just matter of considering what to do with external components supporting internal applications; also, internal applications become external from the applicationconsumer perspective.

The new enterprise security perimeter has different manifestations depending on the type of cloud architecture in use—namely, whether private, hybrid, or public under the NIST classification.

The private cloud model is generally the starting point for many enterprises, as they

try to reduce data center costs by using a virtualized pooled infrastructure. The physical infrastructure is entirely on the company's premises; the enterprise security perimeter is the same as for the traditional, vertically owned infrastructure, as shown in Figure 1-5.

Figure 1-5. Traditional security perimeter

The next step in sophistication is the hybrid cloud, shown in Figure 1-6. A hybrid cloud constitutes the more common example of an enterprise using an external cloud service in a targeted manner for a specific business need. This model is hybrid because the core business services are left in the enterprise perimeter, and some set of cloud services are selectively used for achieving specific business goals. There is additional complexity, in that we have third-party servicelets physically outside the traditional enterprise perimeter.

Figure 1-6. Security perimeter in the hybrid cloud

The last stage of sophistication comes with the use of public clouds, shown in Figure 1-7. Using public clouds brings greater rewards for the adoption of cloud technology, but also greater risks. In its pure form, unlike the hybrid cloud scenario, the initial on-premise business core may become vanishingly small. Only end users remain in the original perimeter. All enterprise services may get offloaded to external cloud providers on a strategic and permanent basis. Application components become externalized, physically and logically.

Figure 1-7. Generalized cloud security perimeter

Yet another layer of complexity is the realization that the enterprise security perimeter as demarcation for an IT fortress was never a realistic concept. For instance, allowing employee access to the corporate network through VPN is tantamount to extending a bubble of the internal network to the worker in the field. However, in practical situations, that perimeter must be semipermeable, allowing a bidirectional flow of information.

A case in point is a company's website. An initial goal may have been to provide customers with product support information. Beyond that, a CIO might be asked to integrate the website into the company's revenue model. Examples might include supply-chain integration: airlines making their scheduling and reservation systems, or hotel chains publishing available rooms, not only for direct consumption through browsers but also as APIs for integration with other applications. Any of these extended capabilities will have the effect of blurring the security boundaries by bringing in external players and entities.

Note An iT organization developing an application is not exclusively a servicelet consumer but also is making the company become a servicelet provider in the pursuit of incremental revenue. The enterprise security boundary becomes an entity enforcing the rules for information flow in order to prevent a free-for-all, including corporate secrets flying out the window.

If anything, the fundamental security concerns that existed with IT delivered out of corporate-owned assets also apply when IT functions, processes, and capabilities migrate to the cloud. The biggest challenge is to define, devise, and carry out these concepts into the new cloud-federated environment in a way that is more or less transparent to the community of users. An added challenge is that, because of the broader reach of the cloud, the community of users expands by several orders of magnitude. A classic example is the airline reservation system, such as the AMR Sabre passenger reservation system, later spun out as an independent company. Initially it was the purview of corporate staff. Travel agents in need of information or making reservations phoned to access the airline information indirectly. Eventually travel agents were able to query and make reservations directly. Under the self-service model of the cloud today, it is customary for consumers to make reservations themselves through dozens of cloud-based composite applications using web-enabled interfaces from personal computers and mobile devices.

Indeed, security imperatives have not changed in the brave new world of cloud computing. Perimeter management was an early attempt at security management, and it is still in use today. The cloud brings new challenges, though, such as the nosy neighbor problem mentioned earlier. To get started in the cloud environments, the concept of trust in a federated environment needs to be generalized. The old concept of inside vs. outside the firewall has long been obsolete and provides little comfort. On the one hand, the federated nature of the cloud brings the challenge of ensuring trust across logically and geographically distributed components. On the other hand, we believe that the goal for security in the cloud is to match current levels of security in the enterprise, preferably by removing some of the outstanding challenges. For instance, the service abstraction used internally provides additional opportunities for checks and balances in terms of governance, risk management, and compliance (GRC) not possible in earlier monolithic environments.

We see this transition as an opportunity to raise the bar, as is expected when any new technology displaces the incumbent. Two internal solution components may trust each other, and therefore their security relationships are said to be implicit. If these components become servicelets, the implicit relationship becomes explicit: authentication needs to happen and trust needs to be measured. If these actions can't be formalized, though, the provider does not deliver what the customer wants. The natural response from the provider is to put liability-limiting clauses in place of an SLA. Yet there is trouble when the state-of-the-art can't provide what the customer wants. This inability by service providers to deliver security assurances leads to the brazen disclaimers mentioned above.

Significant progress has been achieved in service performance management. Making these contractual relationships explicit in turn makes it possible to deliver predictable cost and performance in ways that were not possible before. This dynamic introduces the notion of service metadata, described in Chapter 10. We believe security is about to cross the same threshold. As we've mentioned, this is the journey we are about to embark on during the next few chapters.

The transition from a corporate-owned infrastructure to a cloud technology poses a many-layered challenge: every new layer addressed then brings a fresh one to the fore.

Today we are well past the initial technology viability objections, and hence the challenge du jour is security, with security cited as a main roadblock on the way to cloud adoption.

A Roadmap for Security in the Cloud

Now that we have covered the fundamentals of cloud technology and expressed some lingering security issues, as well as the dynamics that led to the creation of the cloud, we can start charting the emerging technology elements and see how they can be integrated in a way that can enhance security outcomes. From a security perspective, there are two necessary conditions for the cloud to be accepted as a mainstream medium for application deployment. We covered the first: essentially embracing its federated nature and using it to advantage. The second is having an infrastructure that directly supports the security concerns inherent in the cloud, offering an infrastructure that can be trusted. In Chapter 2, we go one level deeper, exploring the notion of “trusted cloud.” The trusted cloud infrastructure is not just about specific features. It also encompasses processes such as governance, assurance, compliance, and audits.

In Chapter 3, we introduce the notions of trusted infrastructure and trusted distributed resources under the umbrella of trusted compute pools and enforcement of security policies steming from a hardware-based root of trust. Chapter 4 deals with the idea of attestation, an essential operational capability allowing the authentication of computational resources.

In a federated environment, location may be transparent. In other cases, because of the distributed nature of the infrastructure, location needs to be explicit: policies prescribing where data sets and virtual machine can travel, as well as useful ex post facto audit trails. The topic of geolocation and geotagging is covered in Chapter 5. Chapter 6 surveys security considerations for the network infrastructure that links cloud resources.

Chapter 7 considers issues of identity management in the cloud. And Chapter 8 discusses the idea of identity in a federated environment. The latter is not a new problem; federated identity management was an important feature of the cloud's predecessor technology, grid computing. However, as we'll show, considerations of federation for the cloud are much different.

Summary

We started this chapter with a set of commonly understood concepts. We also observed the evolution of security as IT made of corporate-owned assets to that of augmented with externalized resources. The security model also evolved from an implicit, essentially “security by obscurity” approach involving internal assets to one that is explicit across assets crossing corporate boundaries. This federation brings new challenges, but it also has the possibility of raising the bar in terms of security for corporate applications. This new beginning can be built upon a foundation of trusted cloud infrastructure, which is discussed in the rest of this book.

 
Found a mistake? Please highlight the word and press Shift + Enter  
< Prev   CONTENTS   Next >
 
Subjects
Accounting
Business & Finance
Communication
Computer Science
Economics
Education
Engineering
Environment
Geography
Health
History
Language & Literature
Law
Management
Marketing
Philosophy
Political science
Psychology
Religion
Sociology
Travel